Effects of different doses of remimazolam on hemodynamics during general anesthesia in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The stability of hemodynamics plays a vital role in the process of anesthesia induction for patients with septic shock. As a new-type benzodiazepine, remimazolam has numerous advantages, including rapid induction, rapid recovery, stable hemodynamics, and mild respiratory depression. Nevertheless, reports about the effects of remimazolam on hemodynamics in patients with septic shock are still limited. The study aimed to evaluate the effects that different doses of remimazolam have on hemodynamics in inducing general anesthesia in patients with septic shock. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital from January 2023 to June 2023, 75 patients with septic shock caused by acute appendicitis-induced sepsis were selected as observation subjects. They were randomly assigned to receive low-dose [0.2 mg/(kg·h)], medium-dose [0.3 mg/(kg·h)], and high-dose [0.4 mg/(kg·h)] remimazolam by using a random number table, with 25 patients in each group. Their intraoperative conditions were recorded, including operation duration, intraoperative hemorrhage volume, intraoperative transfusion volume, and decannulation time. Hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), and stoke volume index (SVI) were collected at seven-time points (T0: before induction; T1: before intubation; T2: after intubation; T3: the start of operation; T4: 15 min after operation; T5: 30 min after operation; T6: the end of operation). We also compared hepatic and renal function indexes, including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (sCr), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cells (WBC), tumor necrosis factor-α2 (TNF-α2), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), of the three groups of patients before operation and 1, 3, 5, 7 days after operation. In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions in the three groups was recorded and compared. RESULTS: During remimazolam induction, the number of patients with intraoperative need for rescue remimazolam in the medium-dose and high-dose groups was significantly lower than in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). In terms of hemodynamic indexes, MAP in the high-dose group at T2 was lower than that at T0 (p < 0.05), and MAP at T2 was significantly lower in the high-dose group than that in the medium-dose group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, MAP at T4 in the medium-dose and high-dose groups declined compared with the low-dose group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR, CI, and SVI at different time points among the three groups (p > 0.05), but levels of HR and SVI decreased and CI increased after anesthesia compared with those before operation. Additionally, in comparison with the levels before operation, levels of sCR, BUN, PCT, WBC, TNF-α, and IL-6 were higher on postoperative days 1, 3 (p < 0.05) and lower on postoperative day 7 (p < 0.05). After the operation, both levels of BUN and sCR in the medium-dose and high-dose groups were lower than those in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam is safe and effective for inducing general anesthesia in patients with septic shock. Low, medium, and high doses of remimazolam can maintain a stable hemodynamic state, and the recovery of hepatic and renal function is certain to depend on the dose.

An observational study on the impact of overcrowding towards door-to-antibiotic time among sepsis patients presented to emergency department of a tertiary academic hospital.

BACKGROUND: The latest Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 recommends early antibiotics administration. However, Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding can delay sepsis management. This study aimed to determine the effect of ED overcrowding towards the management and outcome of sepsis patients presented to ED. METHODS: This was an observational study conducted among sepsis patients presented to ED of a tertiary university hospital from 18th January 2021 until 28th February 2021. ED overcrowding status was determined using the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Score (NEDOCS) scoring system. Sepsis patients were identified using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and their door-to-antibiotic time (DTA) were recorded. Patient outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. P-value of less than 0.05 for a two-sided test was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Total of 170 patients were recruited. Among them, 33 patients presented with septic shock and only 15% (n = 5) received antibiotics within one hour. Of 137 sepsis patients without shock, 58.4% (n = 80) received antibiotics within three hours. We found no significant association between ED overcrowding with DTA time (p = 0.989) and LOS (p = 0.403). However, in-hospital mortality increased two times during overcrowded ED (95% CI 1-4; p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: ED overcrowding has no significant impact on DTA and LOS which are crucial indicators of sepsis care quality but it increases overall mortality outcome. Further research is needed to explore other factors such as lack of resources, delay in initiating fluid resuscitation or vasopressor so as to improve sepsis patient care during ED overcrowding.

Gram-negative sepsis caused by a rare pathogen Phytobacter ursingii.

This case reviews the clinical course of an elderly woman on chronic total parenteral nutrition who developed sepsis secondary to a rare, newly described gram-negative rod known as Phytobacter ursingii The patient noticed a leak in her Hickman catheter when infusing her nutrition. 24 hours after a new catheter was replaced, the patient developed fevers, chills and weakness. She presented to the hospital with hypotension and tachycardia, meeting shock criteria. Blood cultures grew P. ursingii, and the diagnosis of septic shock was confirmed. Susceptibilities informed antibiotic coverage, and she ultimately improved within the next 48 hours.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibition limits endotoxic shock by suppressing IL-6 production by marginal zone B cells in mice.

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response to a severe, life-threatening infection with organ dysfunction. Although there is no effective treatment for this fatal illness, a deeper understanding of the pathophysiological basis of sepsis and its underlying mechanisms could lead to the development of new treatment approaches. Here, we demonstrate that the selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibitor acalabrutinib augments survival rates in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic model. Our in vitro and in vivo findings both indicate that acalabrutinib reduces IL-6 production specifically in marginal zone B (MZ B) cells rather than in macrophages. Furthermore, Btk-deficient MZ B cells exhibited suppressed LPS-induced IL-6 production in vitro. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling, which is the downstream signaling cascade of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), was also severely attenuated in Btk-deficient MZ B cells. These findings suggest that Btk blockade may prevent sepsis by inhibiting IL-6 production in MZ B cells. In addition, although Btk inhibition may adversely affect B cell maturation and humoral immunity, antibody responses were not impaired when acalabrutinib was administered for a short period after immunization with T-cell-independent (TI) and T-cell-dependent (TD) antigens. In contrast, long-term administration of acalabrutinib slightly impaired humoral immunity. Therefore, these findings suggest that Btk inhibitors may be a potential option for alleviating endotoxic shock without compromising humoral immunity and emphasize the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between immunomodulation and inflammation suppression.

Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock (EPOS-1): study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled phase IIa dose-escalation trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sepsis remains the major cause of death among hospitalised patients in intensive care. While targeting sepsis-causing pathogens with source control or antimicrobials has had a dramatic impact on morbidity and mortality of sepsis patients, this strategy remains insufficient for about one-third of the affected individuals who succumb. Pharmacological targeting of mechanisms that reduce sepsis-defining organ dysfunction may be beneficial. When given at low doses, the anthracycline epirubicin promotes tissue damage control and lessens the severity of sepsis independently of the host-pathogen load by conferring disease tolerance to infection. Since epirubicin at higher doses can be myelotoxic, a first dose-response trial is necessary to assess the potential harm of this drug in this new indication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock-1 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-escalation phase IIa clinical trial to assess the safety of epirubicin as an adjunctive in patients with sepsis. The primary endpoint is the 14-day myelotoxicity. Secondary and explorative outcomes include 30-day and 90-day mortality, organ dysfunction, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and cytokine release. Patients will be randomised in three consecutive phases. For each study phase, patients are randomised to one of the two study arms (epirubicin or placebo) in a 4:1 ratio. Approximately 45 patients will be recruited. Patients in the epirubicin group will receive a single dose of epirubicin (3.75, 7.5 or 15 mg/m2 depending on the study phase. After each study phase, a data and safety monitoring board will recommend continuation or premature stopping of the trial. The primary analyses for each dose level will report the proportion of myelotoxicity together with a 95% CI. A potential dose-toxicity association will be analysed using a logistic regression model with dose as a covariate. All further analyses will be descriptive. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05033808.

High-dose vitamin C improves norepinephrine level in patients with septic shock: A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The effects of vitamin C supplementation on patients with septic shock remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effects of different vitamin C dosages on norepinephrine (NE) synthesis in adult patients with septic shock. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with septic shock admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) between July 2021 and December 2022 were included. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: high-dose vitamin C (150 mg/kg/d, group A), low-dose vitamin C (50 mg/kg/d, group B), and placebo (group C). NE synthesis-related indicators (dopamine-ß-hydroxylase [DßH], tyrosine hydroxylase [TH], tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4], and dopamine [DA]), plasma NE, and vitamin C levels were measured every 24 hours and analyzed. All-cause mortality within 28 days and other clinical outcomes (including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE], Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA], and Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome [MODS] scores) were compared. RESULTS: Changes in TH, BH4, and DßH levels at 96 hours in groups A and B were greater than those in group C. These differences became more pronounced over the course of the intravenous vitamin C administration. Significant differences between groups A and C were detected at 96-hours TH, 72-hours BH4, 96-hours BH4, 96-hours DA, and DßH levels every 24 hours. The 96-hours TH, 96-hours BH4, and 48-hours DßH in group B were significantly higher than those in group C. The NE levels every 24 hours in groups A and B were higher than those in group C, group A and group C had a statistically significant difference. The 96-hours exogenous NE dosage in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in group C. No significant reductions in APACHE, SOFA, or MODS scores were observed in the vitamin C group, including the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation. The 28-days mortality was lower in groups A and B than in group C (0%, 10%, and 16.67%, P = .187), but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: For patients with septic shock, treatment with vitamin C significantly increased TH, BH4, and DßH levels and reduced the exogenous NE dosage, but did not significantly improve clinical outcomes.

The scientific rationale and study protocol for the DPP3, Angiotensin II, and Renin Kinetics in Sepsis (DARK-Sepsis) randomized controlled trial: serum biomarkers to predict response to angiotensin II versus standard-of-care vasopressor therapy in the treatment of septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Data to support the use of specific vasopressors in septic shock are limited. Since angiotensin II (AT2) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2017, multiple mechanistically distinct vasopressors are available to treat septic shock, but minimal data exist regarding which patients are most likely to benefit from each agent. Renin and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) are components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system which have been shown to outperform lactate in predicting sepsis prognosis, and preliminary data suggest they could prove useful as biomarkers to guide AT2 use in septic shock. METHODS: The DARK-Sepsis trial is an investigator-initiated industry-funded, open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial of the use of AT2 versus standard of care (SOC) vasopressor therapy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with vasodilatory shock requiring norepinephrine ≥ 0.1 mcg/kg/min. In both groups, a series of renin and DPP3 levels will be obtained over the first 24 h of treatment with AT2 or SOC. The primary study outcome will be the ability of these biomarkers to predict response to vasopressor therapy, as measured by change in total norepinephrine equivalent dose of vasopressors at 3 h post-drug initiation or the equivalent timepoint in the SOC arm. To determine if the ability to predict vasopressor response is specific to AT2 therapy, the primary analysis will be the ability of baseline renin and DPP3 levels to predict vasopressor response adjusted for treatment arm (AT2 versus control) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary outcomes will include rates of acute kidney injury, need for mechanical ventilation and kidney replacement therapy, lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital, ICU and hospital mortality, and rates of prespecified adverse events. DISCUSSION: With an armamentarium of mechanistically distinct vasopressor agents now available, sub-phenotyping patients using biomarkers has the potential to improve septic shock outcomes by enabling treatment of the correct patient with the correct vasopressor at the correct time. However, this approach requires validation in a large definitive multicenter trial. The data generated through the DARK-Sepsis study will prove crucial to the optimal design and patient enrichment of such a pivotal trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05824767. Registered on April 24, 2023.

CM1, a Chrysin Derivative, Protects from Endotoxin-Induced Lethal Shock by Regulating the Excessive Activation of Inflammatory Responses.

Sepsis, a leading cause of death worldwide, is a harmful inflammatory condition that is primarily caused by an endotoxin released by Gram-negative bacteria. Effective targeted therapeutic strategies for sepsis are lacking. In this study, using an in vitro and in vivo mouse model, we demonstrated that CM1, a derivative of the natural polyphenol chrysin, exerts an anti-inflammatory effect by inducing the expression of the ubiquitin-editing protein TNFAIP3 and the NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT1). Interestingly, CM1 attenuated the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-induced production of inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/MAPK and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signalling pathways. In addition, CM1 induced the expression of TNFAIP3 and SIRT1 on TLR4-stimulated primary macrophages; however, the anti-inflammatory effect of CM1 was abolished by the siRNA-mediated silencing of TNFAPI3 or by the genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of SIRT1. Importantly, intravenous administration of CM1 resulted in decreased susceptibility to endotoxin-induced sepsis, thereby attenuating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil infiltration into the lung compared to control mice. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that CM1 has therapeutic potential for diverse inflammatory diseases, including sepsis.

Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of infected pancreatic necrosis in France: a bicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) mortality increases when pancreatic necrosis is infected (IPN). Current treatment of IPN relies on prolonged antibiotic therapies associated with a step-up strategy of drainage. The objective of this study was to analyze IPN treatment outcomes in two referral centers in France. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with documented IPN hospitalized in two expert centers in France between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The composite primary outcome was the proportion of unsuccessful management outcome, defined as new emergency drainage to treat sepsis with organ failure, an unplanned new antibiotic course, an unplanned prolongation of antibiotic course and/or death by septic shock, within three months following the diagnosis of ANP. RESULTS: All in all, 187 patients (138 males; 74.0%), with documented IPN were included. The most frequently identified microorganism was Escherichia coli (26.2%). Ninety-eight patients (52.4%) were admitted to an intensive care unit or resuscitation ward within the first two days of ANP care. Overall, 126 patients (67.4%) endured an unsuccessful outcome: new emergency drainage to treat acute sepsis (62.0%), unplanned new antibiotic course (47.1%), unplanned prolongation of antibiotic course (44.9%) and/or death by septic shock complicating IPN (8.0%). CONCLUSION: The unfavorable evolution in two thirds of patients shows that determination of optimal drainage timing and choice of antibiotic therapy remain major challenges in 2024.

Thiamine administration in septic shock: a post hoc analysis of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: This is a post hoc analysis of combined cohorts from two previous Phase II clinical trials to assess the effect of thiamine administration on kidney protection and mortality in patients with septic shock. METHODS: Patient-level data from the Thiamine in Septic Shock Trial (NCT01070810) and the Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock Trial (NCT03550794) were combined in this analysis. The primary outcome for the current study was survival without the receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Analyses were performed on the overall cohort and the thiamine-deficient cohort (thiamine < 8 nmol/L). RESULTS: Totally, 158 patients were included. Overall, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.90]) and not needing RRT (aOR: 2.59 [95% CI 1.01-6.62]). In the thiamine-deficient group, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (aOR: 8.17 [95% CI 1.79-37.22]) and surviving to hospital discharge (aOR: 6.84 [95% CI 1.54-30.36]). There was a significant effect modification by baseline thiamine deficiency for alive and RRT-free (interaction, p = 0.016) and surviving to hospital discharge (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: In the combined analysis of two previous randomized trials, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free at hospital discharge in patients with septic shock. This signal was stronger in patients with thiamine deficiency.

Albumin versus saline infusion for sepsis-related peripheral tissue hypoperfusion: a proof-of-concept prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Albumin has potential endothelial protective effects through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the effect of albumin on peripheral tissue perfusion in human sepsis remains poorly known. METHODS: Bi-centric prospective study included patients with sepsis with or without shock and prolonged CRT > 3 s despite initial resuscitation. Clinicians in charge of the patients were free to infuse either saline 500 mL or human serum albumin 20% 100 mL over 15 min. Global hemodynamic parameters as well as peripheral tissue perfusion were analyzed after 1 (H1) and 4 h (H4). The primary endpoint was CRT normalization (< 3 s) at H1. RESULTS: 62 patients were screened, and 50 patients (13 sepsis and 37 septic shock) were included, 21 in the saline group and 29 in the albumin group. SOFA score was 8 [5-11], and SAPS II was 53 [45-70]. Median age was 68 [60-76] years with a higher proportion of men (74%). The primary sources of infection were respiratory (54%) and abdominal (24%). At baseline, comorbidities, clinical and biological characteristics were similar between groups. At H1, CRT normalization (< 3 s) was more frequent in patients receiving albumin as compared to patients treated by saline (63 vs 29%, P = 0.02). The decrease in fingertip CRT was more important in the albumin group when compared to saline group (- 1.0 [- 0.3; - 1.5] vs - 0.2 [- 0.1; - 1.1] seconds, P = 0.04) as well as decrease in mottling score. At H4, beneficial effects of albumin on peripheral tissue perfusion were maintained and urinary output trended to be higher in the albumin group (1.1 [0.5-1.8] vs 0.7 [0.5-0.9] ml/kg/h, P = 0.08). Finally, arterial lactate level did not significantly change between H0 and H4 in the saline group but significantly decreased in the albumin group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In patients with resuscitated sepsis, albumin infusion might lead to greater improvement of tissue hypoperfusion compared to saline. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05094856.

Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.

Septic shock typically requires the administration of vasopressors. Adrenergic agents remain the first choice, namely norepinephrine. However, their use to counteract life-threatening hypotension comes with potential adverse effects, so that non-adrenergic vasopressors may also be considered. The use of agents that act through different mechanisms may also provide an advantage. Nitric oxide (NO) is the main driver of the vasodilation that leads to hypotension in septic shock, so several agents have been tested to counteract its effects. The use of non-selective NO synthase inhibitors has been of questionable benefit. Methylene blue, an inhibitor of soluble guanylate cyclase, an important enzyme involved in the NO signaling pathway in the vascular smooth muscle cell, has also been proposed. However, more than 25 years since the first clinical evaluation of MB administration in septic shock, the safety and benefits of its use are still not fully established, and it should not be used routinely in clinical practice until further evidence of its efficacy is available.